Reframing Clean Beauty: Governance, Transparency, and Biodiversity-Related Practices in the Global Cosmetics Sector with Implications for Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/jos-2026-21104Keywords:
Clean Beauty, Biodiversity Conservation, Biodiversity Governance, Sustainable Sourcing, Supply-chain Traceability, Cosmetics IndustryAbstract
The rapid global expansion of clean beauty, which relies extensively on natural capital, raises questions about its environmental impact, particularly in relation to biodiversity conservation. While the industrial demand for natural ingredients continues to rise, empirical assessments linking clean beauty practices and biodiversity outcomes remain limited. This study presents an exploratory, governance-oriented assessment of biodiversity-related practices among clean beauty brands, based on publicly available disclosures. This study develops a quantitative scoring framework for evaluating 10 major international and Japanese clean beauty brands using a small-10 pilot design across five domains: (1) sustainable sourcing, (2) biodiversity conservation initiatives, (3) supply-chain traceability, (4) ESG disclosure, and (5) environmental innovation. Japan's comparison is institutionally motivated. The results indicate that biodiversity performance is determined less by the use of natural ingredients or market scale and more by governance mechanisms, such as structured sourcing programs, third-party certifications, and transparent reporting systems. International brands consistently outperform Japanese brands, reflecting stronger institutional environments and higher biodiversity literacy abroad. In contrast, domestic brands showed lower disclosure levels and greater performance variance, partly due to weaker national standards and limited public awareness of biodiversity issues. The findings suggest that clean beauty should be reframed not as a category defined by naturalness, but as a governance model that enables coexistence with nature. In addition to standardisation by industry organisations, policy implications include the need for standardised biodiversity metrics in Japan and potential governmental support, such as subsidies to help small- and medium-sized enterprises obtain internationally recognised sustainability certifications. Future research should integrate and evaluate industry standards and life-cycle assessment to assess biodiversity impacts in the cosmetics sector.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, N., Thompson, S., & Glaser, M. (2025). Integrating governance perspectives for biodiversity conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 291, 110392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110392
Alviri, H., Lynes, J., & Habib, K. (2025). Beyond green chemistry: A comprehensive review of how sustainability has been integrated into cosmetic research. Global Sustainability, 8, e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.16
Anthropocene Science Editorial Board. (2022). Advancing global biodiversity governance: Recommendations for strengthening the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Anthropocene Science, 1(1), 13–20.
BASF. (2025). BASF Beauty Care Solutions France S.A.S. recognized as a member of the Union for Ethical BioTrade. BASF Care 360° Portal. https://care360.basf.com
Coscieme, L., Sutton, P. C., Mortensen, L. F., Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Trebeck, K., & Fioramonti, L. (2022). Ranking the ecological sustainability of global companies. Nature Communications, 13, 3251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30885-7
Del Greco, A., Bani, M., Rampoldi, G., Ardenghi, S., Galli, P., Strepparava, M. G., & Russo, S. (2024). Sustainable production and consumption in cosmetics. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 38, 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.015
Ferraro, G., & Failler, P. (2024). Understanding the implementation gap to improve biodiversity governance: An interdisciplinary literature review. Journal of Sustainability Research, 6(1), e1573. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20240015
Gibson, R. B. (2012). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765147
Hutchinson, J., Obermeister, N., & Turnhout, E. (2026). Pathways for transforming biodiversity governance: An examination of the Global Biodiversity Framework’s considerations. Ambio. Advance online publication.
International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF). (2019). IFF-LMR gains industry-first FairWild certification for Peru balsam. https://ir.iff.com/news-releases
Irie, M. (2025). Clean beauty: Cosmetic development pursuing safety, ethics, and environmental consciousness. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan, 59(3), 155–161.
Japan Cosmetic Licensing Association. (2025). JCLA+ Newsletter (Vol. 13).
Kawahara, K. (2023). Challenges in biodiversity information disclosure: A literature review. Kinki University Repository.
Kumar, N., & Kapoor, S. (2023). Green consumerism and sustainable cosmetic consumption: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15, 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310221
Limbu, Y. B., & Ahamed, A. F. M. J. (2023). What influences green cosmetics purchase intention and behaviour? A systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 15, 11881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511881
Lucas Meyer Cosmetics. (2022). IBR ethical sourcing commitments 2022–2025. Lucas Meyer Cosmetics. https://www.lucasmeyercosmetics.com
Madzík, P., & Gondová, A. (2022). Natural cosmetics and biodiversity: A global supply-chain assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131150
Pentol, A. (2021). Guerlain commits to protecting biodiversity through UEBT membership. TRBusiness. https://www.trbusiness.com
Perret, J. K., Gómez Velázquez, A., & Mehn, A. (2025). Green cosmetics: The effects of package design on consumers’ willingness-to-pay and sustainability perceptions. Sustainability, 17(6), 2581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062581
Premium Beauty News. (2022). Expanscience cosmetic active ingredients: Wild resources certification. https://www.premiumbeautynews.com
Rocca, R., Acerbi, F., Fumagalli, L., & Taisch, M. (2022). Sustainability paradigm in the cosmetics industry: State of the art. Cleaner Waste Systems, 3, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100057
Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Green supply-chain transparency and traceability: Implications for natural-ingredient industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104987
Schleip, I., Timpte, M., & Bauer, A. (2021). Corporate biodiversity accountability in the personal care industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 2796–2810. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2767
Senanayake, R., Addison, P., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2024). Toward more nature-positive outcomes: A review of corporate disclosure and decision-making on biodiversity. Sustainability, 16, 8110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188110
Smedley, P. (2022). Sederma renews UEBT membership, commits to ethical sourcing. Cosmetics & Toiletries. https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com
Stern, C. (2023, December 7). Combating biodiversity loss through ethical ingredient sourcing. Cosmetics Design Europe. https://www.cosmeticsdesign.com
Takai, A., & Nagai, M. (2023). Relationship between certifications of sustainable cosmetics and biodiversity. Bulletin of the University of Fukui.
THREE Cosmetics. (2025). Essential Scents R product information. https://www.threecosmetics.com
Union for Ethical BioTrade. (n.d.). Impact case study: Natura. https://uebt.org
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., McDermott, C., Vijge, M. J., & Cashore, B. (2025). Promising governance approaches for reversing biodiversity loss. Biological Conservation, 292, 110417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110417
Weleda. (2025a). General product catalog. https://www.weleda.jp
Weleda. (2025b). Sourcing policy. https://www.weleda.jp
Wirtu, Y. D. (2024). A review of the environmental and health effects of synthetic cosmetics. Environmental Science Review Journal, 12.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data used in this study were derived from publicly available sources, including corporate websites, sustainability reports, and certification disclosures. The processed data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Miyuki Nagai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Accepted 12-02-2026
Published 07-03-2026