Seismic Performance and Sustainability of BRB and SMA-Braced Structures Under Incremental Dynamic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/jos-2025-1118Keywords:
Sustainable Structural Design, Iron-Based Shape Memory Alloy (SMA-Fe), Buckling Restrained Brace (BRB), Nitinol Shape Memory Alloy (SMA-Niti), Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), Permanent Deformation Reduction, Superelastic Behaviour, Seismic ResilienceAbstract
Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are widely used for seismic resistance due to their efficiency and stable structural behaviour. However, despite their high energy dissipation capacity, BRBs retain residual strains, leading to permanent deformations that require extensive post-earthquake repairs. To address this limitation, shape memory alloys (SMAs) have emerged as an innovative solution. SMAs exhibit superelasticity and shape memory effects, enabling self-centering behaviour that reduces residual deformation and enhances seismic resilience. This study compares the seismic performance of structures equipped with BRBs and those using iron-based and nickel-based SMAs. Using SeismoStruct, incremental dynamic analysis was conducted on a seven-story structure with various bracing configurations. Results show that iron-based SMAs achieve lower permanent displacements than nickel-based SMAs while maintaining excellent energy dissipation. Although SMA-braced structures have slightly higher peak displacements than BRBs, they eliminate permanent deformation, making them a promising solution for sustainable, earthquake-resistant design by reducing repair needs and construction waste.
References
Abbass, A., Attarnejad, R., & Ghassemieh, M. (2020). Seismic assessment of RC bridge columns retrofitted with near-surface mounted shape memory alloy technique. Materials, 13(7), 1701.
Alvandi, S., & Ghassemieh, M. (2014). Application of shape memory alloys in seismic isolation: A review. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 47(2), 153-171.
Alvandi, S., & Ghassemieh, M. (2014). Seismic evaluation of base isolated system equipped with Shape memory alloys. In Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publications.
Aryan, H., & Ghassemieh, M. (2015). Seismic enhancement of multi-span continuous bridges subjected to three-directional excitations. Smart Materials and Structures, 24(4), 045030.
Aryan, H., & Ghassemieh, M. (2017). A superelastic protective technique for mitigating the effects of vertical and horizontal seismic excitations on highway bridges. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 28(12), 1533-1552.
Aryan, H., & Ghassemieh, M. (2020). Numerical assessment of vertical ground motion effects on highway bridges. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 47(7), 790-800.
Birgani, S. A., Zadeh, S. S., Davari, D. D., & Ostovar, A. (2024). Deep Learning Applications for Analysing Concrete Surface Cracks. International Journal of Applied Data Science in Engineering and Health, 1(2), 69-84.
Chowdhury, M. A., Rahmzadeh, A., Moradi, S., & Shahria, M. (2019). Feasibility of using reduced length superelastic shape memory alloy strands in post-tensioned steel beam–column connections. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 30(2), 283-307.
Clark, P. W., Aiken, I., Kasai, K., & Kimura, I. (2000). Large-scale testing of steel unbonded braces for energy dissipation. In Proceedings of the [Conference Name]. (Add conference name and page numbers if available.)
Dolatabadi, N., Shahverdi, M., Ghassemieh, M., & Motavalli, M. (2021). RC structures strengthened by an iron-based shape memory alloy embedded in a shotcrete layer—Nonlinear finite element modeling. Materials, 13(23), 5504.
Dolce, M., & Cardone, D. (2001). Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications 1. Martensite and austenite NiTi bars subjected to torsion. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 43(11), 2631-2656.
Farmani, M. A., & Ghassemieh, M. (2016). Shape memory alloy-based moment connections with superior self-centering properties. Smart Materials and Structures, 25(7), 075028.
Farmani, M. A., & Ghassemieh, M. (2017). Steel beam-to-column connections equipped with SMA tendons and energy dissipating devices including shear tabs or web hourglass pins. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 135, 30-48.
Ghassemieh, M., & Kargarmoakhar, R. (2013). Response modification factor of steel frames utilizing shape memory alloys. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 24(10), 1213-1225.
Ghassemieh, M., & Kari, A. (2013). Application of shape memory alloys in seismic control of steel structures. Advances in Materials Science and Applications, 2(2), 66-72.
Ghassemieh, M., Bahaari, M., Ghodratian, S., & Nojoumi, A. (2012). Improvement of concrete shear wall structures by smart materials. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(3), 87.
Ghassemieh, M., Ghodratian, S. M., Bahari, M. R., & Nojoomi, S. A. (2013). Seismic enhancement of coupled shear walls using shape memory alloys. Journal of Civil Engineering and Science, 2(2), 93-101.
Ghassemieh, M., Mostafazadeh, M., & Sadeh, M. S. (2012). Seismic control of concrete shear wall using shape memory alloys. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 23(5), 535-543.
Ghassemieh, M., Rezapour, M., & Sadeghi, V. (2017). Effectiveness of the shape memory alloy reinforcement in concrete coupled shear walls. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 28(5), 640-652.
Ghodratian, S. M., Ghassemieh, M., & Khanmohammadi, M. (2011). Uniform distribution of ductility demand in irregular bridges using shape memory alloy. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 5(11), 606-612.
Gholampour, A., Ghassemieh, M., & Kiani, J. (2014). State of the art in nonlinear dynamic analysis of smart structures with SMA members. International Journal of Engineering Science, 75, 108-117.
Ghowsi, A. F., & Sahoo, D. R. (2013). Seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced frames with varying beam-column connections. International Journal of Steel Structures, 13(4), 607-621.
Graesser, E., & Cozzarelli, F. (1991). Shape-memory alloys as new materials for aseismic isolation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117(11), 2590-2608.
ISO. (2015). ISO 14001: Environmental Management Systems-Requirements with Guidance for Use. ISO.
Kari, A., Ghassemieh, M., & Abolmaali, S. (2011). A new dual bracing system for improving the seismic behavior of steel structures. Smart Materials and Structures, 20(12), 125020.
Kari, A., Ghassemieh, M., & Badarloo, B. (2019). Development and design of a new self-centering energy-dissipative brace for steel structures. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 30(6), 924-938.
Khan, M. M., & Lagoudas, D. C. (2002). Modeling of shape memory alloy pseudoelastic spring elements using Preisach model for passive vibration isolation. In Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Modeling, Signal Processing, and Control. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering.
Kiggins, S., & Uang, C.-M. (2006). Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system. Engineering Structures, 28(11), 1525-1532.
Kim, J., & Seo, Y. (2004). Seismic design of low-rise steel frames with buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 26(5), 543-551.
Kimura, K., Yoshioka, K., Takeda, T., Fukuya, Z., & Takemoto, K. (1976). Tests on braces encased by mortar in-filled steel tubes. In Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan. (Add page numbers if available.)
Mahin, S., Uriz, P., Aiken, I., Field, C., & Ko, E. (2004). Seismic performance of buckling restrained braced frame systems. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
Merritt, S., Uang, C.-M., & Benzoni, G. (2003). Subassemblage testing of corebrace buckling-restrained braces. University of California, San Diego.
Mortazavi, S., Ghassemieh, M., & Motahari, S. (2013). Seismic control of steel structures with shape memory alloys. International Journal of Automation and Control Engineering, 2(1), 28-34.
Motahari, S. A., & Ghassemieh, M. (2007). Multilinear one-dimensional shape memory material model for use in structural engineering applications. Engineering Structures, 29(6), 904-913.
Motahari, S., Ghassemieh, M., & Abolmaali, S. (2007). Implementation of shape memory alloy dampers for passive control of structures subjected to seismic excitations. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63(12), 1570-1579.
Ostovar, A. (2023). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Asphalt Emulsion Types. (Master's thesis). University of Nevada, Reno.
Ostovar, A., Davari, D. D., & Dzikuć, M. (2025). Determinants of Design with Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks: A Comparison with Logistic Regression. Sustainability, 17(6), 2611.
Rezapour, M., Ghassemieh, M., Motavalli, M., & Shahverdi, M. (2021). Numerical Modeling of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Strengthened with Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy Strips. Materials, 14(11), 2961.
RV, R. K., Prashantha, S., Adarsh, S. H., & Kumara, P. A. (2022). A Review Article on FeMnAlNi Shape Memory Alloy. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 355-359.
Sabelli, R. (2001). Research on improving the design and analysis of earthquake-resistant steel-braced frames. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI).
Sato, A., Chishima, E., Soma, K., & Mori, T. (1982). Shape memory effect in γ ϵ transformation in Fe-30Mn-1Si alloy single crystals. Acta Metallurgica, 30(6), 1177-1183.
Seismosoft. SeismoStruct: A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures. Seismosoft.
Tanaka, Y., Kainuma, R., Omori, T., & Ishida, K. (2015). Alloy design for Fe-Ni-Co-Al-based superelastic alloys. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2, S485-S492.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.