Sustainability Evaluation in the Steel Industry: A Supply Chain Performance-Based Model

Antonio Savi; Luan Santos; Sofia Helena Zanella Carra; Giovanna Tosto Franco

doi:10.55845/jos-2026-2131

Authors

Antonio Savi Production Engineering Program (PEP/COPPE/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7537-9556
Luan Santos Production Engineering Program (PEP/COPPE/UFRJ) & Faculty of Business Administration and Accounting Sciences (FACC/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4131-1329
Sofia Helena Zanella Carra Production Engineering Program (PEP/COPPE/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-7352
Giovanna Tosto Franco Faculty of Business Administration and Accounting Sciences (FACC/UFRJ) https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1977-6163

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55845/jos-2026-2131

Keywords:

Steel Industry, Sustainability, Supply Chain, Evaluation Model

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance is increasingly relevant for corporate sustainability, mainly in high-impact sectors. Building on a previously developed ESG evaluation model, this paper adapts it to the steel sector, considering its specific context and challenges. The model evaluates an Anchor Company (AC), the buyer and focal point, and their Supply Chain (SC), outputting scores for each and a consolidated score, acknowledging the responsibility and potential impact of the SC. This work uses empirical data from a Brazilian steel company, which showed strong ESG maturity, and their suppliers, which showed decent ESG results. However, after integrating the scores, the final ESG score of the AC was significantly influenced by the SC, with 61% of the consolidated result structurally driven by the model's supply chain weighting, reflecting the dominance of scope 3 dynamics in the sector. The findings highlight that to promote effective sustainability, companies must go beyond their boundaries and actively address ESG risks and opportunities across their SC. This study contributes to the sustainability literature by proposing and testing a sector-specific ESG evaluation model in the Brazilian steel industry context, with practical implications for corporate decision-making and potential for adaptation to other regions and sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amel-Zadeh, A.; Serafeim, G. Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey. Financial Analysts Journal, v. 74, n. 3, p. 87–103, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2

Bergskaug, E. Performance of the ESG Momentum Strategy. University of Vaasa School of Finance, Master’s Thesis in Finance, 2019

Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U. and Cabrera Giraldez, M., GreenComp The European sustainability competence framework, Punie, Y. and Bacigalupo, M. editor(s), EUR 30955 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-76-46485-3, doi:10.2760/13286, JRC128040, 2022

Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Geneva, UN-Dokument A/42/427, 1987

Busco, C.; Consolandi, C.; Eccles, R. G.; Sofra, E. A Preliminary Analysis of SASB Reporting: Disclosure Topics, Financial Relevance, and the Financial Intensity of ESG Materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, v. 32, i. 2, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12411

CDP. Engaging the Chain: Driving Speed and Scale. CDP Global Supply Chain Report, 2021.

Chen, J.Y. Responsible sourcing and supply chain traceability. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 248, 108462, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108462

Cook, J.; Nuccitelli, D.; Green, S.; Richardson, M.; Winkler, B.; Painting, R.; Way, R.; Jacobs, P.; Skuce, A. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, v. 8, n. 2, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024

Cormack, A.; Thomé, A.; Silvestre, B. An integrative conceptual framework for supply chain sustainability learning: A process-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128675, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128675

De Gouveia, M.; Inglesi-Lotz, R. Examining the relationship between climate change-related research output and CO2 emissions. Scientometrics, v. 126, i. 11, p. 9069-9111, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04148-x

Di Napoli et al. BMC Public Health. (2022). Tracking the impacts of climate change on human health via indicators: lessons from the Lancet Countdown. Retrieved from https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-13055-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13055-6

Friedlingstein, Pierre et al. Global Carbon Budget 2021. Earth System Science Data, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1917–2005, 2022. Disponível em: https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/1917/2022/.

Godden, Doug et al. The Role of Steel Manufacturing in the Global Economy. Oxford Economics. Worldsteel Association. 2019

Grewal, J.; Riedl, E. J.; Serafeim, G. Market Reaction to Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure. Management Science, v. 65, n. 7, p. 3061–3084, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3099

GRI. Global Reporting Initiative Standards. Amsterdam: GRI, 2021.

Hertwich, E. G.; Peters, G. P. Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 43, n. 16, p. 6414–6420, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es803496a

Huq, F.A., Chowdhury, I.N., Klassen, R.D. Social management capabilities of multinational buying firms and their emerging market suppliers: an exploratory study of the clothing industry. J. Oper. Manag. 46, 19–37, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.07.005

IIRC. International Integrated Reporting Framework. International Integrated Reporting Council, 2021.

Instituto Aço Brasil. Brazil Steel Databook, Anuário Estatístico 2023. Instituto Aço Brasil, 2024

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report. Geneva: IPCC, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

Jamwal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, M. Developing a maturity model for Industry 4.0 practices in manufacturing SMEs. Operations Management Research, v. 18, p. 111–143, 2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-025-00545-0

Khalid, F.; Razzaq, A.; Ming, J.; Razi, U. Firm characteristics, governance mechanisms, and ESG disclosure: how caring about sustainable concerns? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 29, p. 82064-82077, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21489-z

Khan, M.; Serafeim, G.; Yoon, A. Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. The Accounting Review, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1697–1724, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383

Kim, K.; Jeong, B.; Jung, H.; Supply chain surplus: comparing conventional and sustainable supply chains. Flex Serv Manuf J, 26:5–23, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-012-9163-2

Koberg, E.; Longoni, A. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 207, p. 1084-1098, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033

Liu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Seuring, S. New technologies in operations and supply chains: Implications for sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 229, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107889

Mapa Brasil Transparente (MBT), Retirado em https://mbt.cgu.gov.br/publico/avaliacao/escala_brasil_transparente/66#ranking, 2020

Ministério Público do Trabalho (MPT), Anuário Estatístico de Acidentes do Trabalho – 2022. Retirado em: https://www.gov.br/previdencia/pt-br/assuntos/previdencia-social/saude-e-seguranca-do-trabalhador/acidente_trabalho_incapacidade/arquivos/copy2_of_AEAT_2022/aeat-2022, 2022.

MSCI. MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology. MSCI Inc., 2023.

Paulk, M.C.; Curtis, B.; Chrissis, M.B.; Weber, C.V. Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. IEEE Software, v 10, i 4, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/52.219617

Pedersen, L. J. T.; Jorgensen, S.; Mjos, A. Sustainability reporting and approaches to materiality: tensions and potential resolutions. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, v. 13, p. 341-361, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2021-0009

Qian, Y.; Li, Y.; Hao, Y.; Yu, T.; Hu, H. Greenhouse gas control in steel manufacturing: inventory, assurance, and strategic reduction review. Carbon Research, 3:27, 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-024-00118-z

Sanson, A.; Van Hoorn, J.; Burke, S. Responding to the Impacts of the Climate Crisis on Children and Youth. Child Development Perspectives. v 13, i 4, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12342

Santos, Rodrigo. Contribuição do setor mineral no produto interno bruto brasileiro. IPEA, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38116/radar65art6

SASB. Find your industry. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. San Francisco, CA, USA, 2022

Savi, A.; Santos, L.; Savi, M. Sustainability Evaluation: Assessing Supply Chain Impact on Company Performance. Sustainability, 17(3), 1158, 2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031158

Schmidt, M.; Nill, M.; Scholz, J. Determining the Scope 3 Emissions of Companies. Chemical Engineering Technology, v. 45, i. 7, p. 1218-1230, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202200181

SEEG. Mineração responde por 5% das emissões do Brasil. Observatório do clima, 2022 https://oc.eco.br/mineracao-responde-por-5-das-emissoes-do-brasil/

Tipu, S.A.; Fantazy, K. Effects of the attributes of supply chain openness on sustainable supply chain performance, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 69 No. 9, pp. 2047-2068, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2018-0401

Tsalis, T.; Malamateniou, K.; Koulouriotis, D.; Nikolaou, L. New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations' 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Evironmental Management. v 27 i 4, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1910

Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, B.; Yan, M.; Long, Q. A Systematic Review on the Research Progress and Evolving Trends of Occupational Health and Safety Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domains. Front. Public Health, v. 8, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00081

Warmbier, P.; Kinra, A.;Ivanov, D. Supply Chain Sustainability and Resilience – Relationship and Congruent Capability Analysis based on Paradox Theory. IFAC Papers Online, 55-10,311-316, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.625

Wendler, R. The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, v. 54, n. 12, p. 1317–1339, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007

Wissuwa, F.; Durach, C. F.; Choi, T. Y. Selecting resilient suppliers: Supplier complexity and buyer disruption. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 253, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108601

World Economic Forum. Net-Zero Industry Tracker 2023, Why steel can be an unexpected leader in decarbonization. World Economic Forum Agenda, 2023.

World Resources Institute; World Business Council for Sustainable Development. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard – Revised Edition. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2004

World Steel Association. Sustainability Indicators 2023 Report. World Steel Association, 2023.

World Steel Association. 2023 World Steel in Figures. World Steel Association. 2023